RE: Argument from Reason?
June 23, 2015 at 4:25 pm
(This post was last modified: June 23, 2015 at 4:26 pm by Cyberman.)
1. Pseudo-intellectual deepity carefully worded to set up premise 2 (eg "If things were different, things would be different.")
2. Trivial, observable fact led by the nose by premise 1 ("Things are not different.")
3. Non-sequitur punchline ("Therefore [insert popular god du jour] exists.")
2. Trivial, observable fact led by the nose by premise 1 ("Things are not different.")
3. Non-sequitur punchline ("Therefore [insert popular god du jour] exists.")
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
