Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians

[smax]

I must say, it's rather entertaining to watch an ignoramus pat themselves on the back for having no knowledge of historical figures (but hey, as smaxypads clearly stated in post #403, he just doesn't care about facts! Inconsequential here! Lol), for which the documentary evidence is far less extent, while employing depressingly illogical analogies as argumentation which really only goes to show that the label of stupid he received was too charitable.

I gotta be honest, I'm bummed, man. This was fun for a while, but you are getting more and more desperate and ineffective with your retorts. In fact, they aren't even direct now, you are sadly trying to appeal to others with your comments about me. 

I hate that I now have to add "Sad need for approval" to your growing list of pathetic personal characteristics. 

Oh well, at least you know how to call someone stupid without any real basis. That's a ....... uhhhhh ..... thing.