RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 27, 2015 at 2:34 am
(June 26, 2015 at 2:23 pm)Pyrrho Wrote:(June 26, 2015 at 1:06 pm)robvalue Wrote: Err... OK.
So, he thinks the historical Jesus isn't important? That's difficult to get my head around. ...
That is because you are not an expert theologian.
"Expert theologian"

Theology is an empty subject, devoid of facts. It is a subject for incompetent philosopher wannabes.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.