RE: Ask a Traditional Catholic
June 27, 2015 at 2:33 pm
(This post was last modified: June 27, 2015 at 2:37 pm by PiousPaladin.)
(June 27, 2015 at 2:17 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Also, Salazar kept this country in the dark ages while the rest of the world was advancing the 20th century. There's a mentality delay of some 40 years thanks to him.
There's also the spectre of "communists eat babies for breakfast" still lurking in this people due to all the propaganda that regime instilled into us. In other countries, atheists ate babies... It's like they all learn their propaganda techniques from each other... And apply it to their perceived enemies.
The highest point of Portuguese history was a few centuries earlier... When slavery was ok. :p
Exactly, I think that is a wonderful legacy. Portugal has managed to resist much of the evils of modern liberalism and retains closer ties to Catholic teaching than most other European States.
As for your final comment I don't see anything wrong with slavery. The condemnation of slavery was also part of the heretical Vatican II council. The Catholic Church does not condemn slavery, in fact it is useful. Both to us and for the condemned party, it is kinder to enslave a pagan and grant him time to repent than to kill him outright.
(June 27, 2015 at 2:33 pm)Napoléon Wrote:(June 27, 2015 at 2:24 pm)PiousPaladin Wrote: If you create something, you hold all rights of ownership and control over it correct?
So again, you're fine with being a slave.
Good to know, now I know you have no spine or integrity, I can avoid you in the future
Quote:It is no different with God, he owns all creation therefore it is his to do with whatever he pleases. Thankfully in his mercy what he pleases is what is best for us.
I guess you gain pleasure out of sucking the dick of your imaginary overlord as well as being fine with being his little bitch.
God is neither male nor female. We address him as a male due to his appearance as Christ and from his commands in the scriptures.
(June 27, 2015 at 2:20 pm)Nope Wrote:(June 27, 2015 at 2:09 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: You know, Randy is conspicuously absent lately.....
I noticed that he wasn't here. Interesting.
I don't know a lot about traditional Catholicism. Do they not see the current pope as legitimate? If not, who is the real pope?
The Pope is legitimate, those who do not believe Francis is the Pope are known as Sedevacantists. They're very rare and usually shunned in traditionalist circles, they certainly are within the SSPX. It is grounds for excommunication.
Unless Francis is declaring something as an infallible teaching or a Dogma for all Catholics, he can be wrong. We in the SSPX see this, as Vatican II was neither infallible nor a council of the Catholic Church.
