Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 24, 2025, 6:54 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach
#39
RE: Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach
(June 28, 2015 at 3:26 am)Neimenovic Wrote:
(June 28, 2015 at 1:14 am)Huggy74 Wrote: *emphasis mine*
Can you provide any sources for this?

Are you kidding?
How about you open a fucking biology book?
Even the source YOU linked can give you a clear answer. Bacteria are the cause of decomposition, so naturally a larger amount of them means the process will happen faster. It's not rocket science, Huggy.

Here. As if it was so fucking hard to figure out on your own.

Quote:Be aware also that hot temperatures will speed up this process, while cooler temperatures will slow it down. Also, a person who has died with a septic wound will suffer the effects of putrefaction faster, as the bacteria from sepsis spreads quickly and does damage on a larger and faster scale.
source
Seems someone needs some reading comprehension.
Your quote is speaking of SEPTIC wounds speeding up decomposition. A septic wound is a wound that is infected and already rotting you muppet.

http://www.univsource.com/words/septic-adj.htm

Quote:septic (adj) (of a wound or part of your body) poisoned by harmful bacteria.

When a wound/injury gets septic, harmful bacteria poison the wound/injury, and the part of the body that is septic may be rotten.

The diabetic old man had an injury in his leg and before he could be brought to the hospital, the injury became septic. The injured part of the body poisoned by harmful bacteria has become rotten and was stinking. The doctor gave him antibiotics after dressing the injury with antiseptic lotion.
 
The cut on the finger became septic because it was not immediately treated. Harmful bacteria poisoned the injury and puss was oozing from it.

So unless your claiming Jesus died with septic wounds your source is irrelevant.

What Starvald Demelain was claiming is that normal wounds (not septic ones)"of a body that was beaten and crucified" would speed up the rate of decay, This is what I requested his source for....
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach - by Huggy Bear - June 29, 2015 at 12:02 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What will win the god wars? Faith, Fantasy, Facts, or God? Greatest I am 98 16768 December 28, 2020 at 12:01 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 31346 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Travis Walton versus The Resurrection. Jehanne 61 22441 November 29, 2017 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 16842 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 50961 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach Randy Carson 1298 314255 July 26, 2015 at 10:05 am
Last Post: Randy Carson
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 26003 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 521008 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum) YahwehIsTheWay 32 9645 December 11, 2014 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux) YahwehIsTheWay 71 22465 December 2, 2014 at 10:33 am
Last Post: YahwehIsTheWay



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)