RE: Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach
June 29, 2015 at 12:31 pm
(This post was last modified: June 29, 2015 at 12:54 pm by KevinM1.)
(June 29, 2015 at 12:30 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(June 29, 2015 at 12:27 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Are you coming on to me?
---
In all seriousness, there's no set amount of time it takes for a wound to become septic. Given he was beaten, whipped, hammered to a crucifix, and stabbed with a spear, all with unsterilized equipment.
Keep in mind: septic merely means infected.
There maybe no set time for a wound to become infected, but I will guarantee that it is longer than 6 hours...
That's because you're an idiot.
EDIT: Infections are transmitted almost immediately. The time to when symptoms present themselves vary, depending on the bug in question and the body's ability to fight it off. Sometimes no symptoms appear because the body fights it off successfully before the bug can take root. The mitigating factors in this case - a guy living in the unsanitary ancient Middle East spending a day getting beaten and tortured - would obviously compromise his ability to fight it off. And, keep in mind, such bugs would continue to attack his tissue even after death. Which is what everyone else has been saying.
Protip: don't rely on the bible for knowledge about germs.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"