(June 29, 2015 at 12:02 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Seems someone needs some reading comprehension.
Your quote is speaking of SEPTIC wounds speeding up decomposition. A septic wound is a wound that is infected and already rotting you muppet.
So unless your claiming Jesus died with septic wounds your source is irrelevant.
What Starvald Demelain was claiming is that normal wounds (not septic ones)"of a body that was beaten and crucified" would speed up the rate of decay, This is what I requested his source for....
*you're, like in 'you're a fucking idiot'.
Are you claiming that Jesus was whipped, beaten and nailed to a cross without even one wound becoming infected in the times when demons substituted the germ theory?
Are you really that fucking dumb?
No, you intellectually dishonest cretin. The wound does not take longer than six hours to be infected. An infection can happen virtually instantly, like Kev noted, and it would be fucking miraculous if after all that flogging, beating and hammering with obviously unsterilized nails the wound DIDN'T become infected.
Shit, you can become infected by the otherwise harmless bacteria living on your skin if they get into the wound.
And nice goalpost shifting there. Like nobody fucking noticed. You asked for a source to prove bacteria speed up the process of decay, and now you're arguing that it would take longer than 6 hours to infect a wound. Soooo slick -_-
The confidence you show in your blatant dishonesty is nauseating. And don't you fucking dare pull out those quote mined posts of other members like you love to do. Tu quoques won't make you look better.
