RE: Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet
June 29, 2015 at 1:43 pm
(This post was last modified: June 29, 2015 at 1:45 pm by Ace.)
Cinjin
Never mind the whole civil rights issue.
Never mind the fact that two people in love should be allowed to marry regardless of gender.
Never mind that gay marriage has largely no effect on your day to day activities or even your life in general.
Never mind all those numerous reasons for the allowance of gay marriage.
Gay marriage should have been allowed centuries ago. Why? Because of fairness. Marriage is hell, they should have to suffer through it just like all us straight people!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh my fellow forum/bloggers your replies statements sadden me.
Cinjin- It is that very FAIRNESS that I am speaking about.
Again, the final ruling states that marriage, (all of the state, forget and F religious marriage in this argument) is an institution that bestows both DIGNITY AND SECURITY.
I say either do away with marriage altogether or take away all benefits, securities and dignity related to marriage. To keep and proclaim it is a honest institution is a fallacy since it has been argued that the union gives particular rights and privileges that are both economic and social only to a particular type of citizen. Once you grant a particular group in society right/privileges that are not bestowing to all, now it becomes a segregated institution that only gives a particular group in society a distinctly privileges.
“Separate is not equal”!!! regardless of love, happiness, privilege, or any other non-requirements one does not need to marry.
Never mind the whole civil rights issue.
Interesting to call it a civil rights issue since civil mean state laws, (i.e. State’s rights) unlike a personal Fundamental right that is granted by constitutional laws or laws/rights that are protected by the constitution not a state/civil law.
Never mind the whole civil rights issue.
Never mind the fact that two people in love should be allowed to marry regardless of gender.
Never mind that gay marriage has largely no effect on your day to day activities or even your life in general.
Never mind all those numerous reasons for the allowance of gay marriage.
Gay marriage should have been allowed centuries ago. Why? Because of fairness. Marriage is hell, they should have to suffer through it just like all us straight people!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh my fellow forum/bloggers your replies statements sadden me.
Cinjin- It is that very FAIRNESS that I am speaking about.
Again, the final ruling states that marriage, (all of the state, forget and F religious marriage in this argument) is an institution that bestows both DIGNITY AND SECURITY.I say either do away with marriage altogether or take away all benefits, securities and dignity related to marriage. To keep and proclaim it is a honest institution is a fallacy since it has been argued that the union gives particular rights and privileges that are both economic and social only to a particular type of citizen. Once you grant a particular group in society right/privileges that are not bestowing to all, now it becomes a segregated institution that only gives a particular group in society a distinctly privileges.
“Separate is not equal”!!! regardless of love, happiness, privilege, or any other non-requirements one does not need to marry.
Never mind the whole civil rights issue.
Interesting to call it a civil rights issue since civil mean state laws, (i.e. State’s rights) unlike a personal Fundamental right that is granted by constitutional laws or laws/rights that are protected by the constitution not a state/civil law.
