Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet

[Anima]

Those are cursory argument devoid of proper details.  Which would you like to argue?

Happy to debate either. . .but just for fun:

In terms of societal. . .you bring up an awesome point!  Resources are limited, and our population is exploding.  The last thing we need is a higher proportion of straight people having too many kids and using up even more of our dwindling resources.  So we should probably make marriage only for homosexuals in order to incentivize more people to be homosexual!!!

Ha ha. I like that. However, life is a numbers game and your analysis must make consideration of the impact of wars, plagues, and famines as well as the rate of re-population. I would agree with your assessment if the rate of human maturity was handled in the expanse of merely a year or two. Given the need of at least a decade if not two to reach productive and procreative utility we would be best to consider our argument to having more or less in the terms of it being easier to disgard more than it would be to acquire more. So we should encourage a surplus to be discarded at leisure rather than a shortfall which may not readily be replaced, before deficiency become irrevocable.