Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet

[Anima]

They're people. Their relationship deserves to be equally as valid as that of other people.

"There is no greater form of inequality than to try to treat two unequal things as if they are equal" - Aristotle

I am sure we may readily recognize that not all human relationship deserve equal recognition. So now that we acknowledge the theory is sound in principle we are just haggling over price. Under are price haggling we would say in term of societal value there is nothing gained by means of treating their marriage equal to one in which offspring may arise as a natural course of the relationship in satisfaction of both societal and teleological ends.

So infertile straight couples shouldn't be allowed to marry, yes?

Argument may be made to state infertile and elderly couples should not be granted marriage under the societal argument. However, as already been argued extensively under the legal argument policing of this fact would become difficult and burdensome such that the overinclusivenss of infertile couples in marriage is a acceptable societal sacrifice for the sake of conserving resources overall. Though there are countries which require persons to be in physical health and social standing prior to being married.

You didn't address what I said. What is the problem with same sex relationships? Procreation, slippery slope and religion aside.

Are you saying you would like to go down the moral argument in regards to teleological purpose of biological existence?