Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet

[Ace]

The world has 7 billion people and growing, resources just aren't abundant enough to support that population and we're on the verge of tipping point with Global Warming. Society doesnt need kids, it needs education and birth control yesterday.

And regardless, the 2-4% of the population who are homosexual aren't going to make such a massive dent in the situation by not having kids. Let's be real.

And where is this scholarly sourer one lake of resources?

But, lets play you game a little

In making the statement that you just said. . . .can . . .one. . . . say . . .oh. . . .well . . say you are underling arguing raciest?! Hmm?

What country's have this massive population? I know we are not speaking of Europe, North America. . . . (I hear Africa, China, India, Latin America). . . .Hmmm . . . . .

"So because those savages just keep fucking non-stop and are stupid as shit we must serialize them". Easy there Margret Singer (her use of abortion was also a raciest one) as well as sterilization.

---

I'm not exactly sure what you are saying.

Are you agreeing that the nonreligious argument, "humanity needs children" is irrelevant because you understand that homosexuals can also have children?

If so we can move on to the next nonreligious argument against homosexuality!

Hey fuck religion, its just simple numbers. Fucking and little shit's are not only tie to religion. Come on stay with me here.

Example Google new has reported the the Jews populations is getting close to the pre-Holocaust number. How do you ask? . . . well by fucking!

---

Aristocatt Wrote

Are you agreeing that the nonreligious argument
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sorry is misread you comment. Pleas forget my fucking rant.