RE: Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet
July 1, 2015 at 11:38 am
(This post was last modified: July 1, 2015 at 11:47 am by Ace.)
(July 1, 2015 at 11:10 am)robvalue Wrote: You said you want to keep talking about legal aspects with me, when I've said I don't care about the legal aspects. Feel free to talk to everyone else about them though.
I told you to stop posting? When did I do that? I said the point is moot, sure. That's not a commandment for you to stop talking about it. Sorry if you took it as one.
All I meant by "moot" is that the decision has been made, it is legal. You've taken it way too seriously. Please carry on regardless and ignore me.
Take things serious? HAHAHA . .
I am the last person to do so. It is how I interment your post and I could of very will misinterpret it. For that I am sorry. It was nice talking to you, even though it was very little.
My pleasure
I do have a question for all, yet, sadly it will put us back into the law but my question has legitimacy to it.
Ok, hear it is . . .
Marriage is under contract law and today it is now considered a fundamental right. Under the ideas of a fundamental mental right it cannot be denied or taken away. However, if it is under contract law and considered a contract (which many court rulings have :AKA Judge Judy ) that can be dissolved, then is divorce to become illegal? What of annulments?
Because a contract can be dissolved then how is it now considered a fundamental right if one can later on denied, (not want to stay in) and undo, (take way) the marriage contract?
It is also integrating that it is under contract law because it is the states, not the federal government, that can decide who enter into the contract, what it says, and if legal. Right now all same sex couple still must go to the county clerk’s off or some state office and ask for a state licenses. So are the states still in charge of the contract and do they have the same authority over them?