Ask a Traditional Catholic

[Anomalocaris]

Actually, you are the one with nothing. You have no evidence at all for your beliefs except your own feelings. Nothing. At. All.

I can't disprove Loki and neither can you. You can't disprove the existence of any invisible creature.

It is interesting how you ignored the part of my first response to you that all your god's omni (insert traits) contradict one another and make it impossible for him to be real.

If you're going to posit that God does not exist, you're assuming the burden of proof.

Evidence is normally provided at this point.

Actually, you sidling off the stage in acknowledgement of humiliation is the only thing that might save a small amount of you dignity at this point.     

Evidence of non-existence need never be given when there is no worthwhile evidence for existence.     This is for the the simple reason that the set of things that can be conceptualized is infinite, while the set of thing that actually exist is finite

 Therefore any random concept is infinitely more likely to correspond to no existent thing, than to something that actually Exists.   So the default position that maximizes the probability of correctness, buy an essentially infinite margin over any alternative, is anything that can be conceptualized can be presumed to not exist unless proven otherwise.   

Therefore it is always mandatory to supply evidence if one attempts to claim a concept corresponds to reality.   It never requires evidence to assert that some concept not evidenced to correspond to reality in fact does not in fact correspond to any reality.

It is infinitely more probable that your God does not exist, then he exists.  

Now fuck off.