(July 1, 2015 at 8:24 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: If you're going to posit that God does not exist, you're assuming the burden of proof.
Evidence is normally provided at this point.
So if you posit unicorns, invisible purples nothings, godzilla, Allah, Joseph Smith's golden tablets, Zeus, Thor, Nessy, cold fusion, the City of Atlanta, or the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, do not exist the burden of proof is on you Randy.
Seriously, none of those things can be proven not to exist. We (at least I hope it's we) don't believe in them because of the lack of evidence for them. If you don't believe in them, then you understand why I don't believe in your tri-god Yahweh/Jesus/Vague-Spirit-Thingy who is both three separate things and yet only one thing despite 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 /= 1
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.