@mh. I haven't read any legislation on this point. I'm not a lawyer nor am I arguing legality , I'm raising a moral question not a legal one. I would go so far as to say I don't care about the legal definition. Morality and legality not synonymous and this is a philosophy thread not a legal forum. Regarding PMing you. I don't know you well enough to trust you. This is not a slight but a statement of fact. You can choose to believe me or not, again it does not change the facts nor do my claims hinge on my degree. They stand on their own.
Regarding outcomes, poor kids. Etc. As I have stated before, if your goal is to reduce poverty and overcrowding then there are other methods that accomplish this that are much more morally dubious so it is a poor argument to use this as a justification. Additionally it does nothing to address my questions. Finally, I know cpr is not the right term, that was a title for the thread to Draw interest in more layman speak. Agreed that speciality care and a NICU with pediatric vent, surfactant, etc would be required. My point is why should we not arrange it as much as possible to have those resources available and philosophically why is moral not to?
Regarding outcomes, poor kids. Etc. As I have stated before, if your goal is to reduce poverty and overcrowding then there are other methods that accomplish this that are much more morally dubious so it is a poor argument to use this as a justification. Additionally it does nothing to address my questions. Finally, I know cpr is not the right term, that was a title for the thread to Draw interest in more layman speak. Agreed that speciality care and a NICU with pediatric vent, surfactant, etc would be required. My point is why should we not arrange it as much as possible to have those resources available and philosophically why is moral not to?
