RE: Abortion -cpr on the fetus?
July 4, 2015 at 12:06 am
(This post was last modified: July 4, 2015 at 12:07 am by Ravenshire.)
(July 3, 2015 at 11:53 pm)answer-is-42 Wrote: @snakeoil. Listen you dumb as dirt lubricant for fecal regularity you specifically stated it was fine as long as some besides the mother paid (the doctor, a church, ect) that was your arguement. So the morality is based on payer. I don't believe that payment or money has anything to do with morality. How have I mis-interpreted your position ? Regarding the woman didn't get what she wants my point as I stated earlier is that the most she can morally ask for based on the bodily autonomy argument for abortion is a termination of pregnancy. She got that so no right infringed. Try addressing my actual points rahter then hissing on without saying a word.
Misrepresenting my arguments will get you nowhere you limp-dicked, cum guzzling pile of syphilis infected monkey shit. No, the morality is not based on payer, but who the responsibility for the child (got that part yet fuck-tard) falls to after the patients rights are violated by her doctor. Hell, the fact that those rights were violated is enough, but as I have said multiple times, dim-wit, if the doctor arranges to provide for the child's whole fucking life (not the medical costs of being born as you so ignorantly keep ass-uming) then as a stand alone event, saving Baby Goo would not be unethical. Whether or not mommy sues the holy fuck out of the doctor for refusing to perform the abortion he agreed to perform is a whole other subject.
Do you really think you're insults are actually insulting? I've heard better from young grade-schoolers.
With that, I'm done with you.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
