RE: Abortion -cpr on the fetus?
July 4, 2015 at 8:22 am
(This post was last modified: July 4, 2015 at 8:29 am by answer-is-42.)
@pyyrho. Thanks for a good and on point response. Absolutely the crux of the arguement is at what point do we bestow personhood. That seems to be missed by most here. Many (not all) people who oppose abortion do so based on the bodily autonomy arguement. IE even if a fetus is a person, the mothers bodily autonomy trumps theirs. I'm trying to introduce a point that take that out of the equation and is there still a moral justification for termination ? I won't address legality because I'm not a lawyer and honestly am not try to change legislation. What I am doing doing is trying to spark intellectual and moral discussions on why we think some things are ok and again I want to thank you for actually engaging in this. Regarding frozen embryos. That is a difficult moral question for me along the same lines. Certainly they are not independently viable so there are no known ways of salvaging them short of a maternal womb. If there is no womb then my argument really doesn't hold since my point only focused on a fetus who could potentially survived ex utero
@benny I don't care what you think of my assertion on my degree. I began insulting snake oil because I first politely asked him to stop cursing and his response was essentially bring it on (I think he said I'm shaking). So I began insulting him without cursing and generally mocking him/Her related to his username. My insults derive from either snake or oil. If you have an issue with insults then I await your response to snake oil for childish behavior. Insulting some one because they disagree is is wrong. I only insulted snake oil because he continued to insult me and challenged me to do so. If you don't believe me then review this thread. My credentials don't change that so either you are a hypocrite or you will oppose snake oil for childishness. If your only comebacks are personal attacks then you really don't have an argument. I see this much more from theists but I suppose anyone who is challenged in their beliefs and does not want to change them even if they cannot justify them will respond in this way
@benny I don't care what you think of my assertion on my degree. I began insulting snake oil because I first politely asked him to stop cursing and his response was essentially bring it on (I think he said I'm shaking). So I began insulting him without cursing and generally mocking him/Her related to his username. My insults derive from either snake or oil. If you have an issue with insults then I await your response to snake oil for childish behavior. Insulting some one because they disagree is is wrong. I only insulted snake oil because he continued to insult me and challenged me to do so. If you don't believe me then review this thread. My credentials don't change that so either you are a hypocrite or you will oppose snake oil for childishness. If your only comebacks are personal attacks then you really don't have an argument. I see this much more from theists but I suppose anyone who is challenged in their beliefs and does not want to change them even if they cannot justify them will respond in this way
