[/quote]
Redbeard The Pink Wrote
As for polygamy, as long as everything is consensual between adults and nobody is being abused, mistreated, or neglected, I don't really have any inherent moral problems with that either, and neither does your Gaud, for that matter. Might want to check your bible again, Animal.
[/quote]
I remember the religious oppositions position to the homosexual community be that “if we let you then we have to let all sexual activated be accepted.” This argument alone would outrage the gay community, for it was beyond belief that any argument that would compare their plight to any connection of pedophile, insist and polygamy? Was it not the cry and the argument in the courts that, “we do not wish change marriage; we wish to be incorporated in it with the same rights and privileges as straights couples.” Now the law has passed, in you favor but, the outrage of comparison, or the use of those words in the same sentence, is gone. It has changed from “how insulting are you to compare us to . . .” to “we should” integrate these two groups of the sexual spectrum, polygamy and “adult” incest. (Which many have voices in favor of in the blog.)
__________________________Also
It is funny how in these religion and people of religious ideology are seen to be crazy, uneducated, back words people, medieval people. With some type of “fairy tale book that is older than time its self, making it obsolete for use in our current modern day society’s.” We roll our eye’s and even evoke the fray god to end with the stupidity that religious speak about, with that book in their hand.
Just like many of the preachers of fundamental religious do. The say homosexuality is a sin, and provided you with the pages to refer too. However, when informed that Jesus is love, then suddenly such parts of the book disappear
Yet, are not the fellow atheist and leftist doing the very thing that annoys the shit out of people, the use this book when it backs up our ideology and disregard it when it does not. Do not be confused in thinking that Redbeard The Pink Wrote is the only atheist who has used the bible in their argument, a lot of atheist do!!
We can say that others that agree with polygamy have no religious affiliation and that is true. However, it is not the non-religious that are begging to push for it’s acceptance, it is not the non-religious that have case’s in the court’s to have the law changed. It is the members of the extremist of the Mormonism or some fundamental group with a religious argument!
Even knowing this, we allow the religious fanatic to ask for polygamy recognized legally with that book still in hand.
What happen to these people being crazy or uneducated? No. Instead, the liberals and surprisingly the atheist, are willing to back their religious argument to legal recognition!!
Redbeard The Pink Wrote
As for polygamy, as long as everything is consensual between adults and nobody is being abused, mistreated, or neglected, I don't really have any inherent moral problems with that either, and neither does your Gaud, for that matter. Might want to check your bible again, Animal.
[/quote]
I remember the religious oppositions position to the homosexual community be that “if we let you then we have to let all sexual activated be accepted.” This argument alone would outrage the gay community, for it was beyond belief that any argument that would compare their plight to any connection of pedophile, insist and polygamy? Was it not the cry and the argument in the courts that, “we do not wish change marriage; we wish to be incorporated in it with the same rights and privileges as straights couples.” Now the law has passed, in you favor but, the outrage of comparison, or the use of those words in the same sentence, is gone. It has changed from “how insulting are you to compare us to . . .” to “we should” integrate these two groups of the sexual spectrum, polygamy and “adult” incest. (Which many have voices in favor of in the blog.)
__________________________Also
It is funny how in these religion and people of religious ideology are seen to be crazy, uneducated, back words people, medieval people. With some type of “fairy tale book that is older than time its self, making it obsolete for use in our current modern day society’s.” We roll our eye’s and even evoke the fray god to end with the stupidity that religious speak about, with that book in their hand.
Just like many of the preachers of fundamental religious do. The say homosexuality is a sin, and provided you with the pages to refer too. However, when informed that Jesus is love, then suddenly such parts of the book disappear
Yet, are not the fellow atheist and leftist doing the very thing that annoys the shit out of people, the use this book when it backs up our ideology and disregard it when it does not. Do not be confused in thinking that Redbeard The Pink Wrote is the only atheist who has used the bible in their argument, a lot of atheist do!!
We can say that others that agree with polygamy have no religious affiliation and that is true. However, it is not the non-religious that are begging to push for it’s acceptance, it is not the non-religious that have case’s in the court’s to have the law changed. It is the members of the extremist of the Mormonism or some fundamental group with a religious argument!
Even knowing this, we allow the religious fanatic to ask for polygamy recognized legally with that book still in hand.
What happen to these people being crazy or uneducated? No. Instead, the liberals and surprisingly the atheist, are willing to back their religious argument to legal recognition!!
