RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
October 16, 2010 at 11:00 pm
(This post was last modified: October 16, 2010 at 11:03 pm by ib.me.ub.)
Yeah, but the didn't decide to kill millions of innocent people for no reason. Fair enough, the Allies killed millions of innocent people as well, but in retaliation to German aggression, not for a racist idealogy.
Anyway, that wasn't the point of the responce. If Hitler hadn't killed millions of innocent people for no reason, he would be looked at in a much different way. History would have judged him and Germany much differently. The Germans probably would have won the war as well. The resources that went onto killing the Jews was massive & time consuming.
Also, if Hitler was replaced, the German strategy would have been much better. Hitler just made too many mistakes.
Anyway, that wasn't the point of the responce. If Hitler hadn't killed millions of innocent people for no reason, he would be looked at in a much different way. History would have judged him and Germany much differently. The Germans probably would have won the war as well. The resources that went onto killing the Jews was massive & time consuming.
Also, if Hitler was replaced, the German strategy would have been much better. Hitler just made too many mistakes.