(July 19, 2015 at 10:16 pm)Ace Wrote: Anima, I must apologies in assuming that the both of us where possible being ousted for our not so majority position in our responses. However, it seems that it was never us but more of me. As it seems more are engaging and acknowledging your post.
Oh well such is life :-)
I do thank you for your mutual respect for addressing and wiliness to discuss my posts. Truly, It is greatly appreciated.
Change of subject.
See if I am understanding the end conclusion of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's recent ruling of homosexuality in the work force.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, under title 7 has stated that the prohibiting of employment, promotion, and firing on the ground of an individual’s sexual orientation as discriminatory.
Ok, got it. Agree.
However, homosexual discrimination is under S. E. X. discrimination, not a new anti-discrimination section but, a current one. In doing this the protected statues of another minority is extinguished, (i.e. WOMEN).
Sex discrimination, birthed from the women’s liberation movement of the 60’s & 70’s, is meant to aid/create an equal treatment and opportunity in the work force for women who were overlooked for men in employment. In that time, before and even today, men dominate in employment, managerial positions, and payed higher than women.
Contrary to assumed knowledge, S.E.X. discrimination allocation is only WOMEN in the work force, not men! The team S. E. X. is in references to the sex one is born as , NOT what you are fucking!
The term Homosexuality argued to the commission, consist of both Lesbians (WOMEN) and Gay’s (MEN).In the EEOC ruling the term homosexuality is what the commission placed under the protection of sex discrimination. Now that men (gay or not) have been given a protected position under sex discrimination, women’s protected classes under Title 7 and sex discrimination has now just be eliminated!
Because now men can use sex discrimination to protect their position and dominates in the work force. In other words ones sex is obsolete in any consideration in the workforce. Now both sex’s are defined to be equal this nether need for any protection from the strong presents of the other in the workforce, because now there is no one sex dominate the other.
(But we know this is not even remotely true!!!)
Whoa! When did this happen? I have not heard about this? How in the heck did they extend sex protections to men? The whole point of sex protections where in regards to gender to establish fairness for women in the work force.
I need to look this up? If what you are saying is right and gay men qualify for protections than it is discriminatory to deny hetero men the same protections. This subsequently deprives women and minorities of the protections intended to make the playing field fair for disadvantaged groups as the ruling incorporates all groups.
