RE: Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet
July 20, 2015 at 3:36 pm
(This post was last modified: July 20, 2015 at 3:37 pm by Anima.)
“If you look at our movement’s success, we are a lot better at litigating than we are at lobbying,” Mr. Almeida said. “We should take the E.E.O.C. decision and run with it by turning to the federal courts to win workplace protections in all 50 states.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/18/busine....html?_r=0
So it would appear we are giving up on democracy.
“Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is premised on sex-based preferences, assumptions, expectations, stereotypes or norms,” the document stated. “‘Sexual orientation’ as a concept cannot be defined or understood without reference to sex.”
Interesting argument. Though I wonder how it is not applicable to all sex based preferences including heterosexuals?
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/18/busine....html?_r=0
So it would appear we are giving up on democracy.
“Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is premised on sex-based preferences, assumptions, expectations, stereotypes or norms,” the document stated. “‘Sexual orientation’ as a concept cannot be defined or understood without reference to sex.”
Interesting argument. Though I wonder how it is not applicable to all sex based preferences including heterosexuals?
