(May 6, 2013 at 4:39 am)goodnews Wrote: As you used this mathematical formula between first grade and 2012, and as you admit to being a "born again" Christian during this period, one must conclude your hypothetical 2+2=4 equation had a differant result , one must also conclude that as you are still useing this same 2+2=4 equation as a base for your assumptions, therefore one is left with no other conclusion that the foundations of your hypothesis are not grounded but wavering.
My hypothetical equation would be E+E=C (Evidence + Experience = Conclusion) If false evidence along with misunderstood experience are the premise then of course the conclusion will be false. A basis on any falsehood leaves room to waver. However, when you supplement correct evidence and understand the experience correctly based on facts then the conclusion results in a truth, not a false. Truth = truth. There is no reason for waver any longer.
I used to pray... but then I realized I could talk to myself and save 10% too. Who wouldn't go for that?
