RE: Proof Mind is Fundamental and Matter Doesn't Exist
September 14, 2015 at 1:52 pm
(This post was last modified: September 14, 2015 at 1:52 pm by Kingpin.)
Rational, to me you are asserting knowledge of something outside our limitation of knowledge (based on Premise #1's "epistemic limitations"). You premise #1 can equally be stated as: "a metaphysically solipsist world (a world where only a mind exists) cannot be proven true due to epistemic limitations."
If you put that statement as Premise #1 (equally as true as YOUR Premise #1), then the rest of the assumptions do not follow.
If you put that statement as Premise #1 (equally as true as YOUR Premise #1), then the rest of the assumptions do not follow.
We are not made happy by what we acquire but by what we appreciate.