Objectifying women

[Tiberius]

I'd have believed you if said you'd simply misunderstood the original statements. But now you've denied the facts, the statistics, and even the damn dictionary. We've explained and re-explained the point at hand, and yet you keep 'misinterpreting'. You are flat out lying now.

The thing is, I agree with pretty much everything you say. In fact, if you actually listened to what my point was instead of assuming I was victim blaming, I bet you'd even agree with it too. All my points in this thread have been focused on reducing the risk of women being raped outside, on their way home, etc. You categorically denied that there were things women could do to reduce the risk of being raped (like getting a life home, or walking in a group), yet I don't think you even understood what I was saying; instead you just assumed I meant that if a woman got raped, it was her own fault and that if only she'd done x,y,z she wouldn't have been. That wasn't my point, it will never be my point.

So, why should I pay any attention to say, Saerules, who flat out admitted she was trolling and made absolutely no bones about the fact that she was victim blaming? She and Dotard were the only ones honest enough to admit it. Godhead still hasn't read the articles I provided, so why should I continue paying him any attention?

This is one thread, in a forum which has several thousand of them. Saerules has contributed rational discussion to many threads; as has Dotard. The ignore feature is being abused because in one thread, on one particular subject, you disagree with them. It wasn't meant for that. I don't see why people can't simply ignore posts by reading who wrote it, and thinking "Ok, well I don't want to read that one".

Though I am amused that you'd go so far as to abuse your moderator powers to attack me, because for the record, I didn't ignore Godhead because of this thread, but because the idiot hasn't given an honest answer to a question anywhere in the forum, so why should I continue debating it?

I didn't abuse any moderator powers. I have no idea what you are talking about.

I doubt you've read the articles either. You are bitching and whining about being 'ignored' and 'misinterpreted' and you haven't actually read any of our mountains of supporting evidence.

No, I didn't read the articles, because I already agree with your points and what the articles are based on. My area of discussion here was always on reducing the risks; not anything to do with clothing, victim blaming, etc.

I ignore hypocrites and fundies. If you don't like that, ban me.

We have a discussion community here. You are not discussing by any definition of that word. You are giving your opinion and then distorting everything the opposition says, to the point where you cannot defend yourself against their continually re-explanation and are forced to ignore them. Change the attitude, because you won't be making many friends around here if you don't.