RE: On Moral Authorities
November 18, 2016 at 10:53 am
(This post was last modified: November 18, 2016 at 10:53 am by Edwardo Piet.)
(November 18, 2016 at 10:39 am)FallentoReason Wrote: The issue you're having is that for some unknown reason you believe that producing *an* answer, any answer at all, will miraculously make the dilemma false. I've asked for you to justify how it can be neither, and to be fair, you actually did give a response. You keep saying it's because 'gods don't exist'. But see, that assertion is up for debate. The whole reason why there's volumes and volumes of literature on gods/no gods etc. is because we're all trying to find sound reasoning, either for or against the existence of god(s). And simply denying the dilemma 'because gods don't exist' is rather narrow-minded, uninteresting, biased. My equally boring reply to that would be, 'they exist, so you're refutation is wrong'. Now what?
My bold.
I thought you said that you know a false dichotomy is a dichotomy where the answer "neither" could be the case?
The dilemma is false, remember, simply because "neither" can be given as an answer. Do you know what a false dilemma is or not?