RE: Another litany of 'illegal' and 'unethical' house seizures by lazy banks
December 22, 2010 at 7:28 pm
(This post was last modified: December 22, 2010 at 7:30 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(December 22, 2010 at 6:46 pm)theVOID Wrote: In one circumstance you invest other peoples money in exchange for services such as security, withdrawal and interest payments for a low quality high quantity profit.
In the other circumstance you steal a bunch of cash outright without negotiating any return for the owner of the cash, it's high quality low quantity.
In the relevent cases mention at the top, What sort of negotiation concerning any returns did the banks do, and for what did they exchange the service of jettisoning the contained property, when the banks repossessed houses on which there is no mortgage payment they can claim?