(October 15, 2018 at 1:47 pm)Deesse23 Wrote:(October 15, 2018 at 1:05 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Atheists or more specifically materialists, can't account for an objective moral realism.Theists only claim they can, but cant demonstrate their claim to be true.
Show me one, just one moral system that is objective and demonstrate that the base of your system is true/real.
If you cant, then i consider arguing that objective morality is superior to subjective morality like arguing that your garage dragon is a better pet than my german sheperd.
I'll try. Again, it's fairly impossible to bridge the is/aught gap, but that's a problem common to both subjective and objective moralities. This is my attempt to not cross it by tautology.
Assumptions:
Moral Laws promote good
The things that are good, are good.
More good is more good that less good; aka: bringing about good/more good is good
Actions bring about change
Logic:
Actions that bring about good/more good are good actions.
Therefore, moral law must promote good actions to be a moral law.
There, I think I've made an objective claim about morality. It's fairly useless, but objective nevertheless.