RE: Argument against Intelligent Design
June 2, 2019 at 2:57 am
(This post was last modified: June 2, 2019 at 2:59 am by Amarok.)
(June 1, 2019 at 10:19 pm)snowtracks Wrote:Way to not refute my post that you whole post is a giant appeal to crediulity(May 9, 2019 at 7:41 am)Amarok Wrote: So a bunch credulity and backwards thinking is your argument ......SadSo after you asked them, did they acknowledge that naturalism was the most reasonable explanation?
(June 2, 2019 at 2:56 am)Nomad Wrote:And I point out once again the term "most reasonable " to him personnel credulity(June 1, 2019 at 10:19 pm)snowtracks Wrote: So after you asked them, did they acknowledge that naturalism was the most reasonable explanation?
Because it's the only idea that qualifies as a theory in ascientific sense. It both explains the current status and makes predictions which can be falsified.
Your cretinism does neither.
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb