Another way to point out the key flaw in the argument:
Beings that can walk are able to do so because they have been predetermined ultimately by a first cause to do so, therefore this first cause must be the one who is walking.
Surely, Acrobat would disagree with this, but essentially this is what he seems to be arguing except replace "walk" with "assign values and meanings".
Beings that can walk are able to do so because they have been predetermined ultimately by a first cause to do so, therefore this first cause must be the one who is walking.
Surely, Acrobat would disagree with this, but essentially this is what he seems to be arguing except replace "walk" with "assign values and meanings".
