So logic is now philosophical psycho babble, because you can't muster the intelligence to understand it nor the intellectual honesty to be consistent with it? We already know that you have little interest in because you can't support your silly theology with it. After all, you don't give a shit about intellectual honesty or epistemic justification, you simply care about how Jesus makes you feel inside!
What I care about is being rational, and absolutely key to that is having an epistemology, which you agreed with when you want to muster the illusion of intellectualism, but dismiss as psychobabble when it turns out you absolutely fail at it - Double standards much? Not surprising when you have no coherent foundation to check your consistency against!
Only my own answers satisfy me? I just changed my mind today on central controls on education, courtesy of Darkest Of Angels.
You draw your 'conclusions' to fit what you already believe, you DO NOT have any rational foundation or method by which you determine things to be justified what-so-ever. Go ahead and explain it if you like, but you won't, you'll dodge the question again and again and find some way to blame it on something else, just like the intellectually spineless crackpot you are.
.
