If an astronomer discovers a new celestial object, how is his/her finding confirmed? Someone else looks through the telescope, follows the previous astrononomers instructions, and validates the claim. That is Science, Perception.
It's bad science to dismiss the first astronomer because you cannot see the celestial object with the naked eye.
One must look through the telescope (meditation, orison, asceticism) and follow the first astronomers instructions (forget self, carry cross). Withdraw from society, invest a large amount of time reflecting on the self, the nature of the mind, and peel away the layers of perception untill....
If you find something, like a flaming lion that consumes the flesh and an ocean of infinite bliss, a cascade of infinite joy, revealing the true nature of reality; you have found the "celestial object".
If not, maybe you're not looking hard enough or looking too hard as the case may be. The point is, you have to look, otherwise it's bad science.
If you don't believe the claims of the hundreds of thousands of "astronomers" throughout human history, then you just have to see for yourself.
It's bad science to dismiss the first astronomer because you cannot see the celestial object with the naked eye.
One must look through the telescope (meditation, orison, asceticism) and follow the first astronomers instructions (forget self, carry cross). Withdraw from society, invest a large amount of time reflecting on the self, the nature of the mind, and peel away the layers of perception untill....
If you find something, like a flaming lion that consumes the flesh and an ocean of infinite bliss, a cascade of infinite joy, revealing the true nature of reality; you have found the "celestial object".
If not, maybe you're not looking hard enough or looking too hard as the case may be. The point is, you have to look, otherwise it's bad science.
If you don't believe the claims of the hundreds of thousands of "astronomers" throughout human history, then you just have to see for yourself.
