(November 18, 2011 at 4:07 pm)Rhythm Wrote: LOL, No, I did. You made an argument as to how there must be an "eternal basis" for morality. You then argued that this was god. Fine, god is eternal basis. You're only substituting words here. I think we could ask the peanut gallery what god is like and we'll see if this new definition can stand up to scrutiny? That's the trouble. It's a terrible argument, but what if we just cede the entire thing? Then what?
I don't understand. What do you mean, then what? Also, I stated I don't think anyone whom didn't believe in God would be convinced by the argument.