RE: The Case for Atheism
May 10, 2013 at 3:21 pm
(This post was last modified: May 10, 2013 at 3:22 pm by The Reality Salesman01.)
(May 10, 2013 at 3:10 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:Yes, but the subject of any hypothesis worth pursuing should correlate with reality and truth; it should be falsifiable or its not challengeable. Any hypothesis must be equally vulnerable to being shown false as it is for being confirmed. Otherwise, its just spittle.(May 10, 2013 at 2:48 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: It's the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis holds until it is disproved, else, to be consistent, one would have to believe every proposal heard.I disagree. A null hypothesis is a hypothesis still. The hypothesis with the most explanatory power should be the one that holds until disproved.