(May 21, 2013 at 12:55 pm)Drew_2013 Wrote: Excellent...maybe now we can have a real discussion on a level playing field.
On what basis do you consider a Creator not being a possibility worth considering and what counter non-god explanation do you consider to be a much better explanation?
Define creator.
How EXACTLY is the creator supposed to create from nothing?
How can it exist with no time to exist in?
What is the creator made of if here is no material to be made of?
How did the creator gain intelligence when the only way to gain that is through evolution?
Where did your creator come from?
It tries to answer a difficult question with a simplistic answer which breaks down after a moments thought.
It is a silly idea that was an obvious sop to the feeble minded
And there are quite a few possible ways that the cosmos could have been come to be, some of them even have a smidgen of evidence for them and not one of them is supernatural.
here are a few
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00vdkmj
Quote:Sir Roger Penrose has changed his mind about the Big Bang. He now imagines an eternal cycle of expanding universes where matter becomes energy and back again in the birth of new universes and so on and so on.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.