I'll bite.
The only reason TO believe in a supernatural creator is "because someone says so". Think about that. How did you come to believe. Because your parents told you it was true? Your pastor? The Bible? I can tell you how you DIDN'T come to believe. You DIDN'T come to believe by contemplating observations from the world around you, figuring out that a god does exist and what his properties are and coming to the independent realization that this god exists, only to find out later that there was a religion which held those exact same beliefs.
If you take away the Bible (or whatever your holy book of preference) and all personal references to religion, would you believe? Would you be able to come to the exact same conclusions you now hold if someone didn't first tell you what you needed to believe? Or do you have to first know the answer, and only THEN can you find the evidence to support it? Because in all of recorded history the approach of learning the answer first and looking for data to support that answer later has NEVER worked. When you're looking for "truth" you can't start with an answer. If you do then you're not looking for truth at all, you're looking for validation. So, if the world were exactly as it is today with the one exception that nobody had ever had a concept of a god of any sort, there were not god beliefs, no holy books, no religions, would you be able to look around you and come to the conclusion that your god, specifically, exists? The answer, of course, is no.
The only reason TO believe in a supernatural creator is "because someone says so". Think about that. How did you come to believe. Because your parents told you it was true? Your pastor? The Bible? I can tell you how you DIDN'T come to believe. You DIDN'T come to believe by contemplating observations from the world around you, figuring out that a god does exist and what his properties are and coming to the independent realization that this god exists, only to find out later that there was a religion which held those exact same beliefs.
If you take away the Bible (or whatever your holy book of preference) and all personal references to religion, would you believe? Would you be able to come to the exact same conclusions you now hold if someone didn't first tell you what you needed to believe? Or do you have to first know the answer, and only THEN can you find the evidence to support it? Because in all of recorded history the approach of learning the answer first and looking for data to support that answer later has NEVER worked. When you're looking for "truth" you can't start with an answer. If you do then you're not looking for truth at all, you're looking for validation. So, if the world were exactly as it is today with the one exception that nobody had ever had a concept of a god of any sort, there were not god beliefs, no holy books, no religions, would you be able to look around you and come to the conclusion that your god, specifically, exists? The answer, of course, is no.