Rule Changes + New Restrictions

[LastPoet]

I don't know about that - theologyonline used to be pretty good.

I don't know that site, but going by the name, it is something I'm not interested, IMO equates to masturbationonline, hence I never joined it. Why don't you just go there, since its so great?

I've made it clear before and now reiterate that the owners of a site have every right to do with it as they please. Just interesting that you go through the charade of rules which really amount to nothing.

The forum rules are a work in progress, made to accomodate this community in a healthy discussion. We have rules to avoid behaviours that disrupt the forum civility. You said half of Min's posts were 'bad'. The way I see it, the other half makes more contribution than you ever did and will do for 10 years if he stopped posting now.

No, I don't like to whine. Do you realize why I report posts?

When in doubt you should report posts. That doesn't mean they have merit.

Once someone complained about me. I noted that I was tame compared to some atheist posters. Then Tiberius (IIRC - if not a mod) suggested that it was odd that I complain, as I had never filed a formal complaint with the mods.

So, now I occasionally report a post to the mods, as that's apparently necessary to maintain a right to make casual complaints.

In essence, you occasionally whine, but then, you don't realize how many atheist member reports go to the "no action" conclusion, because we have rules. The change of rules here, was done to end an archaic rule the forum had since its begginings and to end IMO a discriminatory rule agains theists, in particular christians, because preaching is a very christian trait. Go about it anyway you want if it gets you all warm and fuzzy inside. The idea is to make a general rule against theist or atheist dumbfucks that use this forum for any other reasons than to have a discussion. Your pet peeve against Minimalist has no weight on that.