You are correct, discipulus - the legal terminology is "beyond a reasonable doubt." Not absolute certainty. So, should we "formally" debate, you will need to make your case (proving) beyond a reasonable doubt.
I will reply later to your other commentary, but I'm about to meet friends for a some dinner and drinks. And not be so serious for a little while.
Your points have merit, but unfortunately, you will still run into the issue of providing objective proof to back up your assertions that God exists, beyond a reasonable doubt.
Would an otherwise reasonable person who knows nothing at all about Christianity, "believe" you when you try to prove God exists?
I will reply later to your other commentary, but I'm about to meet friends for a some dinner and drinks. And not be so serious for a little while.
Your points have merit, but unfortunately, you will still run into the issue of providing objective proof to back up your assertions that God exists, beyond a reasonable doubt.
Would an otherwise reasonable person who knows nothing at all about Christianity, "believe" you when you try to prove God exists?