(May 2, 2014 at 4:39 pm)Heywood Wrote: Your error is that you conflate an attack on an embassy with the killing of an Ambassador. An embassy attack and the killing of an Ambassador are not the same thing.
OK, so the other 13 attacks didn't attempt on any of the ambassadors lives? Or is the scandal that the terrorists got lucky and hit a higher ranking target?And how does "lying" about it (setting aside the question of what evidence you have that he did) help him politically? If the scandal is about an ambassador being killed, how does it help Obama politically that the attack that killed him was during a riot and not a coordinated assault?
Map it out for me, please.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist