RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
October 2, 2015 at 1:02 pm
(October 2, 2015 at 1:43 am)Nestor Wrote: I'm kind of annoyed that Randy was banned. Jenny says she banned him for plagriarism and that this was a majority decision... Ok. For one, it seems like a pretty silly offense,
Try six of them. Does it seem silly when it's six offenses, made by an unrepentant user, for which all other options had been exhausted?
I mean, I don't agree that plagiarism is this silly minor thing either, but then, I would: all of my work is writing, some of it available online. When people plagiarize me- and they have- then they are literally stealing from me, and muddying my brand in the process. They're mental vultures trying to capitalize on what I have made and rob me of my successes. But yes, it's "silly" to care about that. Clearly.
Quote:This, i.e. the elimination of all "our" more engaging opponents, is what makes me completely disinterested in these forums at this point... it's like this place is only useful if I get the urge to come smell my own shit.
"You should suspend the forum rules if I think the rule breaker has interesting things to post."
Is that what you're saying? What would you have us do, seven reports down the line and with warnings and temp bans having no effect?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!