Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.

[Angrboda]

No, it simply shows that you're capable of the fallacy of ignoratio elenchi.  You were claiming that the original Hebrews were black.  For evidence you brought out that some of the oldest Jewish communities in Africa were black, and that an Ethiopian came to Jerusalem and read Jewish literature.  Neither of those show that the original Hebrews were black, much less indisputably so.

The term used was 'ancient' not oldest...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of..._in_Africa
The most ancient communities of African Jews are the Ethiopian, Sephardi, and Mizrahi Jews of North Africa and the Horn of Africa.

Moses's wife was black which is indisputable fact.
Moses was adopted by the daughter of Pharaoh.

Moses was mistaken for an Egyptian
Exodus 2:16-20

16 Now the priest of Midian had seven daughters: and they came and drew water, and filled the troughs to water their father's flock.
17 And the shepherds came and drove them away: but Moses stood up and helped them, and watered their flock.
18 And when they came to Reuel their father, he said, How is it that ye are come so soon to day?
19 And they said, An Egyptian delivered us out of the hand of the shepherds, and also drew water enough for us, and watered the flock.
20 And he said unto his daughters, And where is he? why is it that ye have left the man? call him, that he may eat bread.

Is that good enough for you?

No it's not, Huggy. Your adding the term ancient doesn't add anything to it. That the communities in Africa are the most ancient communities in Africa doesn't mean that they were the original Hebrews. Even according to the bible, there were 12 generations preceding Moses. So you're not even close, in addition to having once again committed ignoratio elenchi. If I were the oldest member of my family living in America, it wouldn't show that my original family was American. Additionally, your passage from Exodus doesn't demonstrate anything because Moses was an Egyptian by adoption and not by birth, so that he was considered an Egyptian by the daughters of Midian doesn't show that he was black. But by all means, keep adding to the Dunning-Kruger argument instead of subtracting from it. (In addition, I don't believe you brought up the Exodus passage in the original thread, so it would be irrelevant anyway. You claimed you had consistently won debates against Khem, past tense; any new arguments you make aren't relevant to whether you won the debate.)