Creation/evolution3

[Esquilax]

Holy shit, you really are a hypocrite, aren't you? You were the one linking to youtube videos as evidence of Noah's ark in another thread!

Seriously? Oh I get your only pretending to be ignorant, just so dry sand doesn't get lonely.

Because if you're really referring to the you tube post in the recent Noah's ark thread I prefaced that post with "this is the YouTube video link that was broken in the OP's orginal nat geo reference." That would mean that the YouTube link I posted wasn't my source material or arguement. It belonged to the national geographic artical the op used.

And if you didn't think it was an effective justification for your position you wouldn't have gone out of your way to post it again. Don't be obtuse, nobody thinks that something isn't a worthy argument for their position and still opts to re-link it.

I know you have the atheist handicap of only seeing what supports your position so I will politely just point out that in the highlighted section of text you posted I intentionally use the phrase "can not otherwise reconcile."
This mean the theory I used does indeed reconcile the two accounts with each other.

For my part, I don't care if you can make up a story that gels with another story and also the factual case for evolution; it's easy to do that if you're just making shit up. What I care about is the actual evidence that led you to that conclusion, the support you can give it beyond that you want to believe it, and frankly I don't think you have any. The reason I think that is that thus far you've shown absolutely no indication that you even feel the need to research the things you talk about; you might be ignoring it completely, but I nailed you on the Large Hadron Collider two or three times in this thread, simply because you seem to think you know everything that needs be known on any given subject.

But five minutes of research proves you wrong, so the one firm conclusion we come to is that you won't do five minutes of research, even on complex topics like particle physics.