Creation/evolution3

[Drich]

Where have I said any of the things you claim mr red herring? Do try and stay on point old sport.

"Old sport"? You Jay Gatsby? Seriously, talk about falling flat on your face.

Also, since you're obviously reading-impaired, I'll type this slowly: I didn't say that you said those things.

My point, since you missed it, clearly, old sport, is that things like the amount of time between "creation" and "the Fall" are irrelevant because you worship a god which collapses under the weight of its internal contradictions. You may as well debate the premise tooth fairies are against world peace, for all the relevance your thread here has to the way the world works.

I use the term 'old sport' sort used as a life preserver for those who's arguements are 'circling the bowl.' It is something for the intelectually weak to single out and attack as a red herring rather than be obliterated on topic. It is a way for you to 'win' while you loose... That is if you can "win" graciously. If however you want to be ass, I get to point out how you've failed not only in your topical posts but I also get to point out that you took the red herring bait as a way to try and save face. Then if you've really set me off I get the option of calling your character and who you are as a person into question for defaulting to a personal attack rather than stay on point.

So you see old sport I get a lot of usage out of this term. It's like a way for me to address your works without identify get them with you, in a nice and or even a proper way. at the same time it sets you up with an out if you are one who needs a panic stop button on the conversation, while kinda giving me the final option as to whether or not let you slide or call you out on your intelectually dishonest behavior.

---

I know you have the atheist handicap of basing your opinions on verifiable facts, and that your POV can and will change as new knowledge is gained.

Fixed.

Carful dry sand just got in trouble for doing that same thing. (You're not allowed to miss quote)

---

Drich, do you believe that these monkey men built cities like Damascus before humans arrived?

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germ...24862.html

This was found in Germany. Drich, do you think that nonhumans made this little figurine?

Nicholas Conard, a professor of prehistory at the University of Tübingen, presented his most recent sensational discovery: a tiny figure of a shockingly anatomically correct woman carved out of mammoth ivory that is at least 35,000 years old and perhaps as old as 40,000.


The carving, called the "Venus of the Fels Cave," is thought to be the oldest human depiction ever found and one of the most ancient pieces of representational art in the world.

I found something else

http://www.sci-news.com/othersciences/an...01925.html

The well-preserved, genetically intact skeleton of a teenage girl who lived about 13,000-12,000 years ago in what is now Mexico is helping resolve a long-standing question of the link between first Americans (Paleoamericans) and modern Native Americans.

This human teenager died longer than 6,000 years ago.

Soulless man and decendants of Adam and physiologically identical, so why wouldn't they be privy to intellegence?

---

How can you trust your Bible?
You can't.

actually you can. How? In it there is a very specific set of promises. If you do ABC God will XYZ
The ABC is to Ask Seek and Knock for the Holy Spirit, and God will send Him. I did, and God was true to His word.

What better proof of God is there than God?

How would the authors know how the world was created?
They wouldn't know;
and don't claim God told them this.
That's called schizophrenia.

It's only schizophrenia if the voice on hears is not real.[/quote]