Creation/evolution3

[Roxy904]

https://atheistforums.org/we-are-infidels/:roflol: Dude, YOU are the ONLY one who didn't get what was being discussed after page 2. Well, I should say Only, because there is a new guy but I don't think he read the op.

Dude, YOU use that emoji WAY too much; and to be honest, people have re-iterated the point several times. I don't quite think you understand what was being discussed.

No this was the Garden.

Oh, yay. A garden. My sister has one of those. When you say the Garden, people assume you are referring to the biblical paradisal garden of Genesis. My (insincere) apologies if I'm mistaken.

Then you should be well contented with me telling you no their was nothing that impacted All of humanity in however long A&E were in the garden besides creation and the Fall of Man.

This doesn't make grammatical or logical sense. So if he's supposed to just accept a story when no empirical evidence, then you should just accept it when I say you are wrong?



welp, if you kept reading Moses was physically changed after that encounter. Meaning the broader impact to man is that being in Direct contact with God Changes a man.

---

Drich, we've discussed this before. "Direct contact with God" is generally called schizophrenia.


So is shifting the goal posts your best effort?

Ask me an extra biblical question then bock at an extra biblical answer?

That's a fail sport. Logical fallacies are for the simple minded, but hey one positive thing I think you spelled all your words correctly.

Again, please clean up your grammar. Your arguments make even less sense without punctuation. Here's another issue we've discussed before, and you mainly ignore me on this. You, however close to the Bible you claim to be, cannot cite it as a factual source of information, because:
a. You do not completely follow all that it says.
b. It has several inconsistent and unreliable claims.
c. It provides no testable facts that can be scientifically proven.

Your own arguments are chock-full of logic fallacies. And, once more, you tend to over-use that roflol emoji; it doesn't exactly lend support to your argument.
I don't know how to fix these quotes, sorry. However, you should be able to tell which posts are Drich's from the poor spelling/grammar.