(January 27, 2015 at 4:36 pm)Tonus Wrote:(January 27, 2015 at 1:41 pm)Drich Wrote: that's not true there are entire lost cities! It's not that people just forgot where the city was. The desert consumes all!But we know that the desert does not consume all. Aside from the evidence of activity in the range of 6,000-7,000 BC there are the ruins found in 2012 that could be slightly older than those. You note that we have developed methods for detecting even those sites that sank beneath the dunes, yet there is no trace of a nomadic group that likely would have been larger than any of those cities. And you claim that they were so thorough that they reused every last pot, tool, weapon and utensil in order not to leave a single scrap. We must also assume that they somehow "recycled" their dead people and livestock and even "recycled" the tons of fecal matter they had to have been producing daily.
So we can find lost cities, we can find remnants of small tribes, we can find armies with their utensils and weapons that were swallowed by the desert, but perhaps the largest ancient occupation of a desert area leaves not a single trace? That simply does not compute.
Because there is no evidence to support any claim in the bible to be true.
So that being said people believe because they want it to be true. If there was evidence of such nomadic people there would be some clear indications some where in those dunes and yet there is none so its clearly made up.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>