RE: Creation/evolution3
January 30, 2015 at 2:32 pm
(This post was last modified: January 30, 2015 at 2:55 pm by Roxy904.)
I don't care if you personally have experienced "God", because I haven't. Let's take gravity on Earth as an example; I experience gravity all the time. I can test it, e.g. dropping something or simply not floating off the ground; others can test gravity as well. Can you apply the same to God? No, not everyone experiences "God" and they can "experience" different ones.
And I (insincerely) apologize that I didn't specify that the people mentioned were Christian (as opposed to when I said Catholic). I often accidently substitute one for the other.
Who are you to claim you know what God tends to think?
After eventually deciphering your ungrammatical post, I claim to the conclusion that you were trying to tell me that I did not do "XYZ" and you did, and that's why you're still Christian and I'm not. That's why I didn't find evidence, apparently. It wasn't at *all* due to the fact that I actually questioned what people told me, and did my research. Once again, another baseless accusation. You are so full of hypocrisy, it's almost funny.
It may be that you personally find the Bible to be where you "Find God", but give me 5 minutes, and the Internet, and anyone can show you horrible parts of the Bible, which is filled with genocide, rape, oppression of minorities, etc.
A) I can't sincerely pray if I can't sincerely believe in what I'm praying to. B) Are you trying to reconvert me? Seriously?
Drich, do you even look at the content of your own posts? You describe your own posts while trying to call mine lazy. What you call red herrings is what others may call making a point.
I never said it wasn't a movie. (The book is better, though.) So, are you saying God uses the "philosophy of breaking the will of an opponent to prevent him from coming back"? What happened to free will?
When people address points you make, that's not a red herring. The points you made, that I addressed, were off the OP.
I'm not sure what you want me to repent from.
The simple fact is that your hypothesis is irrational, as it has no scientific evidence to prove it.
And I (insincerely) apologize that I didn't specify that the people mentioned were Christian (as opposed to when I said Catholic). I often accidently substitute one for the other.
Who are you to claim you know what God tends to think?After eventually deciphering your ungrammatical post, I claim to the conclusion that you were trying to tell me that I did not do "XYZ" and you did, and that's why you're still Christian and I'm not. That's why I didn't find evidence, apparently. It wasn't at *all* due to the fact that I actually questioned what people told me, and did my research. Once again, another baseless accusation. You are so full of hypocrisy, it's almost funny.
It may be that you personally find the Bible to be where you "Find God", but give me 5 minutes, and the Internet, and anyone can show you horrible parts of the Bible, which is filled with genocide, rape, oppression of minorities, etc.
A) I can't sincerely pray if I can't sincerely believe in what I'm praying to. B) Are you trying to reconvert me? Seriously?
Drich, do you even look at the content of your own posts? You describe your own posts while trying to call mine lazy. What you call red herrings is what others may call making a point.
I never said it wasn't a movie. (The book is better, though.) So, are you saying God uses the "philosophy of breaking the will of an opponent to prevent him from coming back"? What happened to free will?
When people address points you make, that's not a red herring. The points you made, that I addressed, were off the OP.
I'm not sure what you want me to repent from.
The simple fact is that your hypothesis is irrational, as it has no scientific evidence to prove it.
Gone
