RE: Creation/evolution3
February 2, 2015 at 1:24 am
(This post was last modified: February 2, 2015 at 1:25 am by Drich.)
(February 1, 2015 at 7:13 pm)IATIA Wrote:(February 1, 2015 at 3:31 pm)Drich Wrote: ... empirical evidence means reasoning drived from some sort of evidence as opposed to position based on pure a theory or logic.Your words, my bold.
Very Good!
Now look up the word evidence.
You know what let me save you four post of dialog of you trying to convince me that your personal defination trumps what I know the defination to be.
As defined by merrium Webster:
1
a : an outward sign : indication
b : something that furnishes proof : testimony; specifically : something legally submitted to a tribunal to ascertain the truth of a matter
2
: one who bears witness; especially : one who voluntarily confesses a crime and testifies for the prosecution against his accomplices
Now put the two definitions together, and you have an authenticated meaning of the term "empirical evidence" and not the made up crap most of you believe to be the defination. Which can be used more accuratly in the support of God, than in the support of macroevolution and or the Big Bang as both of those theories are indeed based in logic and or pure theory.
(February 2, 2015 at 1:21 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: "Artical"
Here one you might want to try: Topical, as in do you think you can manage a post that is 'Topical?'