Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet

[Anima]

Sure.  Why not.  Since you want to misconstrue what I have said than we will go with that.  When they have suffered enough they may have consideration to the club.  After all we do no give protected class status to just anyone.  Or didn't you know that?

Well, I don't really know what protected class status has to do with this one, not really looking to single out teh gayz myself for anything...again, you're the excluder, but sure, our discussion has been eye opening, though probably not regarding the subject you think.  I mean, I'm on the edge of my seat here, lemme try a little recap.

Gays are different things, presumably inferior, and the state might have an interest in preventing them from marrying -which harms heteros...somehow-.......but none of that would mean much if more of them would get seriously hurt, as your group did?  We up to speed?  You got more for me?

Homosexuals are seeking protected class status in order to assure strict scrutiny in regards to any laws which directly or indirectly prohibit them. There current push is to be declared a protected class so as to subject their terminations to inquiry to verify if said termination was discriminatory. As an advocate you really should inform yourself lest you speak ignorantly.

Close. In regards to marriage specifically it is argued that marriage is not a fundamental right. As such the State may legislate what parties may enter into the marriage contract in accordance with the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses under rational basis scrutiny; where the State has a legitimate interest in the procreative result of marriage and their limitation of marriage (and its benefits) to hetero couplings is reasonably related to that interest.

In regards to biology it has been argued homosexuality is an inferior defect which the species and nature do not seek to propagate and is self limiting due to its very own inclination. It is further argued that the inclination leads to an act which has a negative particular resultant that if made universal continue to be negative. As such we should endeavor to further limit the negative potentiality by endeavoring to keep it from becoming an actuality. This is to say to eliminate the defect from the outset or to limit the procreative activity of those so effected with said defect so as to not propagate to the next generation (something many countries due in regards to other genetic defects).