(July 12, 2015 at 11:14 am)Anima Wrote: I await an argument in opposition to #1. It has been demonstrated they represent an increased burden and they inflict a metaphysical and physical harm. So what is your argument they do not?
As I stated earlier I have yet to hear a single argument in their favor. If you know one please share it.
Are you often in the habit of ranking human lives and deciding their worthiness for human rights based on that? Do you extend the same standards to other "burden" classes like the homeless and disabled, or does this ruthless utilitarianism of yours only extend to groups your religion already has a history of special pleading against?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!