Yes. But if you accept the burden of proof you have to realize that logically no God is really any more likely than any other. You might as well be believing in Zeus. You might as well be a Russell's teapotist.
If you don't accept the burden of proof you fully admit to being illogical and irrational. So then once again, you still might as well believe in Zeus or a celestial teapot.
If you don't accept the burden of proof you fully admit to being illogical and irrational. So then once again, you still might as well believe in Zeus or a celestial teapot.