First off, saying that some people say there is no evidence in nature for your or any god is merely preamble to set up a strawman.
1. There's no need to jump to chance in the absence of so-called intelligent design. Arguments from incredulity and/or probability cannot work on their own, they require support. The burden of proof is yours - go for it.
2. The human genome is not a word. It's not even the longest genome; I think that honour goes to some species of amoeba. Again, random chance is not the determining factor.
1. There's no need to jump to chance in the absence of so-called intelligent design. Arguments from incredulity and/or probability cannot work on their own, they require support. The burden of proof is yours - go for it.
2. The human genome is not a word. It's not even the longest genome; I think that honour goes to some species of amoeba. Again, random chance is not the determining factor.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'